1. Leonid09/15/2005 09:03:06
Homepage: http://www.shael-teke.ru
Bravo!!!
2. Jessica 09/15/2005 21:25:24
Leonid, welcome to my blogcosmos!
3. Leonid09/16/2005 02:09:07
Homepage: http://www.shael-teke.ru
Thank you, I'll try, but my English too poor.
4. maria09/19/2005 18:44:04
Lenia, you can write in Russian and we will translate. We want to hear from you! Masha - i Mualim
If anyone would like to receive a short video entitled Mualim and The Green Umbrella and doesn't mind a file 7,000KB (I don't think it's very big) - let me know.
5. Leonid09/20/2005 11:28:51
Homepage: http://www.shael-teke.ru
May be will be better to answer for concrete questions?
6. Jessica 09/20/2005 13:16:45
Ok Maria, you are herebye appointed official Russian/English translator of this blog. Thank you very much for offering to help our Russian friends to participate. We have very much to learn from them.
7. maria09/20/2005 18:19:02
OK, what shall we ask Lenia??
8. Jessica 09/22/2005 19:48:44
A comment written by Leonid in Russian, kindly translated by Maria and now published by me. Read and react!
On Grading
In the annual publication focused on information and analysis entitled “Akhal-Teke Inform” for the year 2005 Tatiana Riabova had published an article under the heading “What is Grading?”. The article prompted me to think critically and make a few observations which I feel are quite important.
First of all, the necessity of grading in relation to purebred horses, of which we consider Akhal-Teke to be an example, is in itself puzzling. I struggle to imagine the English Thoroughbred, categorised not according to race records but by a grading committee. Certainly, if a purebred horse is destined for use in applied breeding [for “applied” read “sports horse breeding” -translator’s note], then a complete set of grading rules must be adhered to, as appropriate for the given type of the partbred horse [for “partbred” read sportshorse – translator’s note]. Categorisation of purebreds used in pure breeding constitutes, in my view, internal stud farm information, whose public disclosure is equal to industrial espionage.
But let us return to the critique of the article in question. “The precursor of the modern grading were remonterskie reglamenty rules of judging of horses”. In other words, in reality this is a strictly applied approach which, as a matter of principle, is unacceptable in relation to purebred horse. [“applied” as in the expression “applied sciences”, as opposed to theoretical science].
To continue the practice of grading means to place the Akhal-Teke horse in the realm of partbreds and within their scope of usage. For the Akhal-Tele to be placed in the position of having to compete with the sportshorse [“partbred” in the original] means a considerable disadvantage, due to the strong specialisation of the latter in the sportshorse market.
The article goes to say that “As in remonterskoi praktike, grading by experts influenced the price of the horse. Further in the attached rules “1. Grading is performed by the suitably qualified experts from the Institute of Horse Breeding.”
How is one to interpret this? Only as an officially accepted collusion between the seller and the buyer and as an introduction of monopoly in the Akhal-Teke horses’ market.
What role is allocated to the Association? [I assume AATK is mean here].
“2. The results of grading are used … in compiling breeding-and-selection programmes, when issuing passports, while conducting price estimates…”. It would be interesting to know who in the today’s market has a stake in having breeding-and-selection programmes issued by the Institute? The monetary estimate is only valid for tax and insurance purposes, otherwise it is a commercial secret. And what is the method used during this monetary estimate? Note that this, again, is done by the qualified experts of the Institute.
“6. Akhal-Teke horse is considered purebred if it satisfies the following criteria:
· The origin of the horse must be confirmed by the immuno-genetic examination of the blood
· All the ancestors of the horse must be present in the General Stud Book of Akhal-Teke Purebred Horses, and the horse under examination must be registered in the Youngstock Register.
What can one say here? The ban on the use of bio-technologies in Akhal-Teke pure breeding, adopted by AATK, have been flagrantly ignored. It is another spite at our Association’s resolutions. This is particularly insulting in view of the birth in 2004 of the colt Samovar, by Gindarkh out of Senova, obtained as a result of the embryo transfer technique at the farm of Allegra Steck in the US.
I also no longer understand why purebreds are those Akhal-Teke who are inscribed in the General Russian Stud Book. So what do we do now with the horses, born outside of Russia? Is it not time to create a collective Associations’ Stud Book?
Such were the numerous questions which were posed by this article. It is time to give them some thought.
9. Allegra Steck09/23/2005 18:22:48
Leonid,
I, nor as far as I know any other American, is a member of AATK, which as I understand is an Association for Russian Akhal-Teke breeders. Therefore, we are not bound by the archaic rules which you choose to adopt. The Akhal-Teke Association of America allows the use of embryo transfer, with sensible limitations, as do most other breed's associations at this date.
You will be interested, I am sure, to learn that Samovar is not the first purebred Akhal-Teke to be born in the US as a result of embryo transfer. At least two other breeders here have embryo transfer foals on the ground older than mine.
DNA testing does not lie. A purebred foal is a purebred foal, regardless of how it is produced and whether or not you personally approve of those methods.
Allegra
BlogSphere V2.5
Join The WebLog Revolution at BlogSphere.net